WC
Q1
ME
The reading passage contends that there are several plans to prevent the spread of the fungus that causes WNS. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
Firstly, the lecturer contends that increasing the acidity in bat caves to deter the fungus from thriving would not be effective. According to a study, this type of fungus has been proved that it has so much immune system to acidity that it could tolerate in even so much high pH level environment.
Secondly, the lecturer points out that antifungal treatments have a lot of side effects. Even though it may stop the spread of the harmful fungus, it could destroy all the other types of fungus which leads to bad consequences because some kinds of them have bacterias which are helpful to maintain overall ecological balance.
Lastly, the lecturer maintains that the idea of providing artificial habitats for the bat species is not a realistic solution. Besides the fact that it requires incalculable cost and time, it won't be beneficial for the bats once residing in this zone as well. This is because after they come back to their original habitat, they will be vulnerable to the environment as they lost their wildness.
GPT
Score: 4 out of 5
Feedback:
Grammar:
You have made a few minor grammatical errors. For instance, "has been proved" should be "has been proven" and "so much immune system to acidity" could be rephrased for clarity, such as "has a strong resistance to acidity."
Vocabulary:
Your vocabulary use is generally good. However, you might want to avoid repetitive usage of some terms and consider synonyms for variety.
Logical Structure:
Your essay has a clear structure, starting with a summary of the reading passage and then presenting the lecturer's counterpoints in a systematic way.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The essay flows smoothly from one point to the next, and the transitions are clear.
Addressing the Task:
You've addressed the task effectively, contrasting the points made in the reading with the lecturer's arguments.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Be more concise in summarizing the reading passage. A concise introduction would allow you more space for the lecturer's arguments.
Ensure that the phrases and terms you use are contextually accurate and clear.
Refine the conclusion a bit more. While you have wrapped up the lecturer's points, it might benefit from a summarizing sentence.
Refined Answer:
The reading discusses various plans to halt the spread of the WNS-causing fungus. Conversely, the lecture offers counterarguments to these suggestions.
First, the lecturer challenges the idea of increasing acidity in bat caves to counteract the fungus. Research indicates that this fungus has a strong resistance to acidic conditions, making it thrive even in high pH levels.
Next, the use of antifungal treatments is debated. While these treatments might halt the harmful fungus, they could simultaneously eradicate other beneficial fungi. These beneficial fungi carry bacteria essential for maintaining the ecological balance.
Lastly, the suggestion of artificial habitats for bats is critiqued. Not only would creating these habitats be costly and time-consuming, but bats inhabiting them could lose their wild instincts. This loss would render them vulnerable when reintroduced to their natural environment.
Teacher
be resistant to be tolerant to VS be vulnerable to
harm destroy ruin the food chain (other living organisms)
negatively affect the environment
disrupt the ecological balance
방법들 plans strategies methods ways approaches solutions steps
효과가 없다 be unworkable be impractical be unfeasible be not workable do not work
~의 확산 The spread of the proliferation of
~를 막다 stop prevent halt
WNS 확산을 막다 stop the spread of ~ prevent the proliferation fo ~ stop ~ from ~ing keep ~ from ~ing
stop keep prevent deter hinder discourage A from B
~제거하다 kill off wipe out exterminate eradicate get rid of remove
군류 곰팡이류 fungus (단수) fungi (복수)
~하는 방법은 없다 There is no way to-v / There is no way that
Answer
The reading passage contends that there are some effective ways to prevent the proliferation of white-nose syndrome in North America. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First, the lecturer points out that raising the acidity of caves is unworkable. A certain type of fungus that causes WNS is tolerant to all kinds of conditions, including acidic ones. Also, only the most extreme acidic conditions can affect the fungus, but achieving and sustaining such a high level of acidity is impossible. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that making caves more acidic can halt the spread of the WNS fungus.
Next, the lecturer asserts that antifungal treatments are not the answer. The drugs would destroy other beneficial fungi and bacteria that live in caves, disrupting the ecological balance and endangering bats and other species. This counters the reading passage's claim that fungus-killing drugs are a good way to stop the WNS fungus.
Finally, the lecturer contends that artificial habitats are impractical. There is no way to construct enough habitats for all bats that live across the country. Moreover, once the bats are returned to the wild, they would become vulnerable to the fungus once again. This refutes the reading passage's claim that artificial habitats would protect bats from exposure to the fungus.
Paraphrasing
The first strategy is to increase the acidity in bat caves.
-> Making caves more acidic can halt the spread of the WNS fungus.
-> Adding acidic fertilizers to caves can stop the spread of the WNS fungus.
A second tactic involves antifungal treatments.
-> Fungus-killing drugs are a good way to stop the WNS fungus.
-> Fungicides are a good solution to WNS.
The final plan of action suggests providing artificial habitats for the bat species.
-> Artificial habitats would protect bats from exposure to the fungus.
Once A are returned to the wild, they would become vulnerable to B once again.
Q2
ME
I understand Scarlett's perspective that Zoos make animals reside in inappropriate condition. However, In my opinion, the advantages of having zoos outweigh this drawbacks. The issue could be solved with the appropriate regulation regarding environmental condition of Zoos. But without Zoos, people won't have opportunity to watch many kinds of animals in person. Additionally, Zoos have an immense influence on our local economy. For example, San Diaego State in the United states are financially supported from Zoo tourism earning hugely. If they have to close the Zoo, it would cause many people to lose their job and make the city less attractive. So I think Zoos should be kept with approvable environment.
GPT
Score: 3.5 out of 5
Feedback:
Grammar:
You've made several minor grammatical errors, like "this drawbacks" should be "these drawbacks" and "San Diaego State" seems to be a typo – you probably meant "San Diego."
Vocabulary:
You have a decent range of vocabulary. However, the phrasing in certain parts could be more sophisticated.
Logical Structure:
You started with an introduction that acknowledged Scarlett's viewpoint and transitioned to your main points. Your essay followed a clear progression.
Coherence and Cohesion:
The flow of the essay is mostly smooth, but you could benefit from better transitions and more elaborated supporting points.
Addressing the Task:
You addressed the task effectively by mentioning Scarlett's viewpoint and then providing counterpoints.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Avoid making absolute statements, such as "people won't have the opportunity to watch many kinds of animals in person" – some may argue that there are wildlife reserves and documentaries.
Work on refining and expanding your supporting points to better develop your arguments.
Clarify and provide more evidence for claims like zoos having a huge influence on local economies. Your point about San Diego (assuming that's the intended reference) is a good start, but it needs a bit more detail for clarity.
Be more specific about what an "approvable environment" means in the context of zoos.
Refined Answer:
I understand Scarlett's viewpoint that zoos might confine animals in suboptimal conditions. Nevertheless, I believe the benefits of maintaining zoos outweigh the disadvantages, especially if there are stringent regulations governing their operations. While there are concerns about animal welfare, these issues can be addressed with the right oversight and improvements to zoo habitats. Moreover, zoos offer the general public an invaluable chance to witness diverse species up close, fostering a connection to the natural world. Furthermore, zoos can significantly contribute to the local economy. For instance, San Diego greatly benefits from the revenue generated by its renowned zoo. Eliminating such institutions could result in job losses and diminished tourist interest in the area. Thus, while it's crucial to ensure animals' well-being, zoos can and should be maintained in a manner that upholds their welfare.
SP
Q1-1
ME
I personally prefer to schedule things for the weeks or months ahead. some people would not agree with me because they think that every plan has changed and it's unpredictable occasionally. However, I I think I can also plan A and B in case things not going to happen it was supposed to do. Additionally, I can save a lot of money and time by scheduling something in advance. so I would say that I prefer to carefully schedule in ahead.
GPT
Score: 3.5 (Fair to Good)
Feedback and Modifications:
Content and Organization: Your response addresses the preference for scheduling things in advance. You acknowledge a potential counterargument and then provide reasons for your stance. The structure is generally good, though some refining in phrasing can make your ideas clearer.
Clarity: The main ideas are clear, but there are areas where the phrasing can be improved for better flow and clarity.
Development and Supporting Details: Your reasoning about having Plan A and Plan B is pertinent, and the point about saving money and time by planning in advance provides a practical perspective.
Grammar and Vocabulary:
"some people would not agree with me because they think that every plan has changed and it's unpredictable occasionally." could be refined to "Some people might disagree, believing that plans can often change and become unpredictable."
The phrase "I I think I can also plan A and B in case things not going to happen it was supposed to do." can be improved to "I believe in having a backup plan, like a Plan A and Plan B, in case things don't go as anticipated."
"so I would say that I prefer to carefully schedule in ahead." can be streamlined to "So, I prefer to schedule carefully in advance."
Modified Response:
I personally prefer to schedule things weeks or months in advance. While some might disagree, believing that plans often change and can be unpredictable, I always believe in having backup options, like a Plan A and Plan B, in case things don't proceed as anticipated. Furthermore, scheduling in advance often allows me to save both time and money. Thus, I favor careful advanced planning.
This revised version provides a clearer presentation of your ideas, making the response more compelling.
Q1-2
ME
Here is my answer for independent Question in TOEFL Speaking
Please provide the score according to the guidelines and give me feedback and modifications in detail.
I think it's better for people to enjoy entertainment together rather than by themselves. Some people may not agree with me because they think it could be a little bit distractive if they go with their friends. However, I believe that even though it's better to focus on you can find it's very sad there is no one to share your feeling. For me I used to enjoy going that kind of place by myself but I found that it's better to share my feeling with my friends and my girlfriends.
GPT
Score: 3 (Fair)
Feedback and Modifications:
Content and Organization: Your response provides a clear stance on the preference for enjoying entertainment in the company of others. You acknowledge a counterargument and then present your reasons. Some refinements can make the response more coherent.
Clarity: The overall idea is understandable, but there are areas where phrasing and sentence structure can be improved to enhance clarity.
Development and Supporting Details: You introduce a personal perspective, which is good. However, this can be expanded upon or explained more clearly.
Grammar and Vocabulary:
"I believe that even though it's better to focus on you can find it's very sad there is no one to share your feeling." is a bit convoluted. It can be revised to: "I believe that, even if it's easier to focus alone, it can feel lonely without someone to share your emotions with."
"For me I used to enjoy going that kind of place by myself" can be improved to: "I used to enjoy such places alone."
"better to share my feeling with my friends and my girlfriends." can be refined to "I've found it's more fulfilling to share those moments with friends or a significant other."
Modified Response:
I believe it's more enjoyable for people to experience entertainment together rather than alone. Some might prefer solitude, thinking friends can be distracting. However, I feel that, even if it's easier to focus when alone, it can be lonely without someone to share emotions with. From personal experience, while I used to appreciate such settings by myself, I've since realized the value of sharing those moments with friends or a significant other.
This revised version enhances clarity and coherence while preserving the core of your original response.
Q2
ME
According to the reading, students won't be permitted to post anything on any wall in the library. The woman in the conversation thinks that it's not a good idea for two reasons. The first reason is that it won't be beneficial for the Library itself. this is because the current advertisement poster shows a lot of information like concert, Club, activities which are very interesting and energetic and students can also check out new stuff on the current poster. The second reason is that the noticeboard is located beside the main entrance so people will have a hard time to read, this is because they can block people who enter the library.
GPT
Score: 3.5 (Fair to Good)
Feedback and Modifications:
Content and Organization: You effectively summarized the reading passage and then transitioned to the woman's viewpoint from the conversation. The structure is clear, with reasons presented in sequence.
Clarity: The main ideas are communicated, though there are areas where phrasing could be improved for enhanced clarity.
Development and Supporting Details: You provide explanations for each reason, capturing the essence of the woman's arguments. Some phrasing can be adjusted to clarify these points further.
Grammar and Vocabulary:
"The first reason is that it won't be beneficial for the Library itself." can be simplified to "Firstly, she believes this won't benefit the library."
"the current advertisement poster shows a lot of information like concert, Club, activities which are very interesting and energetic" can be refined to "the current posters advertise a range of interesting and dynamic events like concerts and club activities."
"Students can also check out new stuff on the current poster" might be clearer as "students often discover new events and opportunities through these posters."
"The second reason is that the noticeboard is located beside the main entrance so people will have a hard time to read," can be adjusted to "Secondly, since the noticeboard is beside the main entrance, it makes it difficult for people to read."
Modified Response:
According to the reading, students are no longer allowed to post on any walls in the library. The woman in the conversation opposes this for two main reasons. Firstly, she believes this change won't benefit the library, as current posters advertise a range of interesting and dynamic events like concerts and club activities. Many students discover new events and opportunities through these ads. Secondly, since the noticeboard is beside the main entrance, it might make it challenging for people to read the posts without obstructing those entering the library.
This revised version offers clearer phrasing and a smoother presentation of the woman's viewpoint, while retaining the essence of your initial response.
Q3
ME
according to the reading, Sexual dimorphism is when two Sexes of the same species exhibit different characteristic. the professor describes dimorphsim in birds of paradise. First, the males of this bird has a unique display which attracts females. their feather has a long and colorful shape which is influenced by females. This is because females select according to males' color and conditions of feather, which implies they are healthy and they are capable of producing healthy offspring. On the other hand, Females doesn't need this feature so their feather is gray and brown which is to be hidden from their predators.
GPT
Score: 4 (Good)
Feedback and Modifications:
Content and Organization: You effectively summarized the reading passage and provided details from the lecture. The structure is clear, with each main point presented sequentially.
Clarity: Your main ideas are communicated effectively, but there are areas where phrasing could be streamlined for better clarity.
Development and Supporting Details: You capture the main details about sexual dimorphism, especially in the context of the birds of paradise, aligning with the professor's explanation.
Grammar and Vocabulary:
"according to the reading, Sexual dimorphism is when two Sexes of the same species exhibit different characteristic." can be revised to "According to the reading, sexual dimorphism occurs when the two sexes of a species display different characteristics."
"the males of this bird has a unique display" should be "the males of this bird have a unique display."
"their feather has a long and colorful shape which is influenced by females." can be clearer as "their feathers are long and colorful, a trait influenced by female preferences."
"Females doesn't need this feature" should be "Females don't need this feature."
Modified Response:
According to the reading, sexual dimorphism occurs when the two sexes of a species display different characteristics. The professor discusses this concept using the birds of paradise as an example. Firstly, the males have unique, long, and colorful feathers, which are shaped by female preferences. This is because females select mates based on the color and condition of a male's feathers, indicating he is healthy and likely to produce strong offspring. In contrast, females don't require such vibrant features, so their feathers are more muted in colors like gray and brown, helping them stay hidden from predators.
This refined version offers clearer phrasing and better grammar while maintaining the essence of your original response.
Q4
ME
in the lecture, the professor describes the two types of protective resemblance. the professor starts a topic by talking about flounder fish. they change their color and skin pattern to be undetected by their predators. So their strategy is rather adaptive rather than permanent. this is because they move their habitat a lot. On the other hand, frogfish, they tend to remain one habitat so it's a permanent type and their color and shape are constantly remaining like their nearby environment like a coral., sponge and if they do not move, it's less likely to be noticed by their predators.
GPT
Score: 4 (Good)
Feedback and Modifications:
Content and Organization: You've captured the main points from the lecture regarding protective resemblance and used examples the professor provided. The structure is logical and sequential.
Clarity: The main ideas are clear, though some sentence structures can be refined for better clarity and flow.
Development and Supporting Details: You've detailed the distinctions between the two types of protective resemblance, drawing on the examples of flounder fish and frogfish.
Grammar and Vocabulary:
"the professor starts a topic by talking about flounder fish." could be "The professor introduces the topic using the example of the flounder fish."
"So their strategy is rather adaptive rather than permanent." can be clearer as "Their strategy is adaptive, not permanent."
"On the other hand, frogfish, they tend to remain one habitat" can be "On the other hand, frogfish tend to remain in one habitat."
"their color and shape are constantly remaining like their nearby environment like a coral., sponge" could be refined to "their color and shape consistently resemble their surrounding environment, such as corals and sponges."
Modified Response:
In the lecture, the professor discusses two types of protective resemblance. He introduces the topic using the example of the flounder fish, which can change their color and skin pattern to evade predators. Their strategy is adaptive rather than permanent, primarily because they frequently change habitats. Conversely, frogfish tend to stay in one habitat, adopting a permanent protective resemblance. Their color and shape consistently resemble nearby elements in their environment, like corals and sponges. As a result, if they remain still, predators are less likely to notice them.
This revised version offers a smoother flow and clearer phrasing while retaining the key points of your original response.