SP TEST 13
Q1
Me
I agree with the following statement that universities should require first year student to live in dormitories on campus some people would not agree with my idea because they might think that it could make students' activities limited to campus but I believe that there are more advantages that offset this shortcoming one thing that comes to my mind when I get this question is it can actually help student in many ways for example when student live in dormitories they can have a chance to interact with other peers by doing so they can learn many things like how to get along with others
GPT:
Score: 4 out of 5
Feedback:
Your response clearly indicates your stance on the topic and provides a specific example to support your point. The structure is easy to follow, beginning with your agreement, acknowledging the counter-argument, and then delving into your reasons for your stance.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Pay attention to sentence length. Some sentences seem run-on and could benefit from being split into two or more distinct sentences for clarity.
Ensure consistent verb tense usage.
Use transitions to smoothly guide the reader from one point to the next.
Revised Answer:
I firmly believe that universities should require first-year students to live in on-campus dormitories. Some might argue against this, fearing it could limit students' experiences to only campus activities. However, I see multiple benefits outweighing this potential drawback. One prominent advantage that comes to mind is the rich social interaction dormitory living fosters. By living in close quarters with peers, students have ample opportunities to interact, learn, and grow together. This setting teaches them invaluable life skills, such as understanding and accommodating diverse personalities.
Teacher
I agree with the statement that universities should require first-year students to live in dormitories on campus some people would not agree with my idea because they might think living in dormitories is not necessary for some students but I believe that it's really important for universities to require a first-year student to live in dormitories on campus one thing that comes to my mind when I get this question is that it can actually help students in many ways for example when the first-year student have to live in dormitories on campus they can have more chance to interact with other students and by doing so they can learn many things like how to get along with other people better.
Q2
Me
According to the reading the university has announced that they are going to prohibit the use of motorcycle on campus the woman in the conversation thinks that it's not a good idea for two reasons the first reason is that the extension of shutter service won't be helpful this is because it is the daytime that students rely on faster Transportation like motorcycle so it won't help student arrive at class on time the second reason she think it won't be beneficial is that there are there already speed limit on campus and it is a very minority that drive unsafely so it's not reasonable to ban everyone to use motorcycle on campus.
GPT:
Score: 3 out of 5
Feedback:
Your response accurately captures the woman's viewpoint regarding the university's decision to ban motorcycles. The structure starts with a description of the reading passage and then delves into the woman's objections. While your content is clear and covers the main points, there are some grammatical and stylistic issues.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Be cautious about your grammar and sentence structure.
Punctuation can help break up your content for easier comprehension.
Refrain from using repetitive structures or phrases.
Revised Answer:
According to the reading, the university has decided to prohibit the use of motorcycles on campus. However, the woman in the conversation disagrees with this decision for two primary reasons. Firstly, she argues that extending the shuttle service won't address the main issue: students need fast transportation during the day to reach classes on time. Motorcycles provide this speedy transit. Secondly, she believes that since there is already a speed limit in place on campus and only a minority of motorcycle users drive recklessly, it's unreasonable to impose a blanket ban on all students.
Teacher
According to the reading the university has announced that they are going to prohibit the use of motorcycles on campus the woman in the conversation thinks that it's not a good idea for two reasons the first reason she doesn't support this new plan is that the increased shutter service won't help students this is because it's the daytime hours that students need fast transportation the second reason she thinks this won't help students in many ways is that it's only a small minority that's driving unsafely she thinks that the university should not ban motorcycles for everyone for these reasons she thinks that the university should not prohibit the use of motorcycles on campus
Q3
ME
Teacher
According to the reading, frustration tolerance is ability to cope with the stress of a challenge the professor describes an example to explain the concept of frustration tolerance. first He starts the topic by talking about his daughter she was working on a puzzle she became frustrated because the puzzle was too hard and she thought she couldn't do it by herself soon she just gave up the professor says that this shows her low frustration tolerance to encourage her he suggested finding just two pieces that might fit together finally she could complete on her own once she started to believe in herself her frustration disappeared this is the example that demonstrates the concept of frustration tolerance.
Q4
Me
In the lecture, the professor describes the trigger of bird migration first she start the topic by talking about daylength. she gives an example of doubler to make her Point some of them spend winter in England and others spend in Spain the bird from England arrives 10 days earlier than the bird from Spain this is because the day length in England increase quickly and then the professor continue the lecture by describing wind direction it's easier to fly with wind and birds know so they start their Journey when the wind blows with the direction which the bird want to travel and the bird use them to speed their migration.
GPT:
Score: 3.5 out of 5
Feedback:
Your response captures the main points from the lecture about the triggers of bird migration, namely the influence of day length and wind direction. The structure is logical and straightforward. However, there are some grammatical errors and the phrasing could be smoother.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Use correct verb tenses consistently.
Be cautious about punctuation and sentence structure.
Clarify and refine phrasing for clarity.
Revised Answer:
In the lecture, the professor discusses the triggers of bird migration, starting with the impact of day length. To illustrate this, she provides an example of the "doubler" bird. Some of these birds winter in England, while others do so in Spain. Interestingly, the birds from England arrive at their destinations 10 days earlier than those from Spain. This is attributed to the quicker increase in day length in England. The professor then moves on to describe the influence of wind direction on bird migration. Birds find it easier to fly with the wind, so they initiate their journeys when the wind is blowing in their preferred direction, using it to expedite their migration.
Teacher
In this lecture, the professor describes the triggers of bird migration first she starts the topic by talking about day length she gives an example of Warbler to make her point some of them spend their winter in England and others spend in Spain the birds from England arrives 10 days before the birds from Spain this is because in England the day length increases more quickly and then the professor continue the lecture by describing wind direction. Birds know it's easier to fly with the wind than against it. so they start migration when the wind blows in the same direction they want to travel Brids use the winds to speed their migration. These are the examples that demonstrate the triggers of bird migration.
Voca
pout 입을 삐쭉꺼리다
WR TEST7
ME:
The reading passage contends that Sucralose should be banned because of three reasons: risk of developing diabetes, producing harmful substances during the cooking and intense allergic reaction. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up several points that contradicts this argument.
Firstly, the lecturer contends that diabetes is unlikely to happen due to consuming sucralose. As she mentions, even though having sucralose results in increasing insulin, it doesn't necessarily mean triggering diabetes. She exemplifies a certain kind of potato which also incurs insulin but no one is concerned about it. She also highlights that people who regularly consume diet soda with sucralose are likely to have diabetes resulting from overweight not just from consuming the component.
Secondly, she points out that the result of experiment in the reading passage, showing that cooking with sucralose produces harmful substances, could not apply to the real world. This is because the temperature during the heating experiment is outrageously high compared to normal situation.
Lastly, She maintains that there are no scientific evidence that sucralose set off allergic reactions. She thinks the anecdote data in the reading passage are unreliable. Moreover, in another experiment to prove whether it is safe or not to consume, there have been no reported cases of these allergic reactions.
GPT:
Score: 4.5 out of 5
Feedback:
You've given a well-organized response that contrasts the reading passage's claims with the lecture's counterarguments. Your use of transitional phrases like "Firstly," "Secondly," and "Lastly" helped clarify the structure and made it easier to follow. Each point made by the lecturer was described in sufficient detail.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Clarify the connection between the example (the potato) and the point about sucralose and diabetes.
Some sentences could be refined for clarity and conciseness.
Consider clarifying or expanding on the final point to explain more about the unreliability of anecdotal data.
Revised Answer:
The reading passage suggests that Sucralose should be banned due to its potential to cause diabetes, the harmful substances it might produce when heated, and the possibility of causing allergic reactions. In contrast, the lecturer offers counterarguments to each point.
First, the lecturer counters the claim about diabetes, stating that while sucralose consumption might increase insulin, it doesn't directly lead to diabetes. She uses the example of a specific potato variety that raises insulin but is not deemed harmful. Additionally, she notes that individuals who often drink diet soda with sucralose might develop diabetes mainly due to being overweight, rather than from the sucralose itself.
Second, she challenges the reading passage's claim about cooking with sucralose. She argues that the experimentally used temperatures in the reading passage are far higher than what is typically used in everyday cooking, making the results less applicable to real-world scenarios.
Finally, the lecturer refutes the allergic reaction claim. She points out the lack of scientific evidence linking sucralose to allergies, highlighting that anecdotal reports, like those in the reading passage, aren't always reliable. Furthermore, other experiments on sucralose safety haven't reported any allergic reactions.
Teacher
Answer
The reading passage contends that sucralose should be prohibited because it negatively affects people's health. On the other hand, the lecture brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First, the lecturer explains that it is unlikely that sucralose cause diabetes. An increase in insulin production does not mean that it leads to diabetes because many other substances that increase insulin production are not considered to cause diabetes. On top of that, people who drink diet soda are often overweight, and obesity is the primary cause of diabetes. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that sucralose puts people at increased risk for diabetes.
Next, the lecturer contends that sucralose doesn't make harmful substances when cooked. The lab test did not involve real-life ingredients and it was hated to higher temperatures than what is normal during food preparation. This counters the reading passage's claim that cooking sucralose results in toxic materials.
Finally, the lecturer points out that there is no evidence of intense allergic reactions. Anecdotal data is unreliable because people hear stories and imagine their symptoms. In addition, no tests have indicated severe allergic reactions to sucralose. This refutes the reading passage's claim that sucralose causes serious allergic responses.
Tip
병명 단수취급 / 무관사
Voca
ban = prohibit
increase in
resistant vs vulnerable
have a great risk of = have a great chance of
spike 급증
hazardous, harmful, dangerous to --
damage- do damage to
harm cause harm to
negatively affect
negatively influence
negatively impact
have a negative effect on
have a negative influence on
have a negative impact on
an increase in / a spike in
decrease in / reduction in / decline in
change in / shift in
decrease decline 자동사
decrease reduce 타동사
increase rise 자동사
increase raise 타동사
A does not mean that it causes B because many other substances that A are not considered to cause B
An increase in insulin production does not mean that it leads to diabetes because many other substances that raise insulin production are not considered to cause diabetes.
Q2
ME
I understand why Cindy points out that remote work is not more efficient than working with people in workspace. However, in my opinion, remote work will totally substitute traditional office-based work in the long run. With a technological advancement, people will be able to overcome issues during remote-working. For example, my friend's company creates virtual office in meta-world. staffs are required to join the world on time. And they work very similar to what they do in real office. For example, when meetings are needed, they can gather together and use the microphone and video camera to communicate each other. My friend told me that he felt that there is almost no difference between working online at the virtual world and at office in real world.
GPT
Score: 4 out of 5
Feedback:
Your response presents a clear stance on the topic and effectively provides an example to back up your viewpoint. You provide context by referencing Cindy's point of view and then contrast that with your own perspective on the matter.
Suggestions for Improvement:
Ensure consistent tense usage. For instance, in "...staffs are required to join the world on time," the use of "staffs" is not grammatically correct. It should be "staff."
Avoid repetition. The phrases "real office" and "office in real world" convey the same meaning and can be streamlined.
Structure the points in a manner that flows logically. After stating your stance, give a brief introduction to your example (the friend's company) and then delve into details.
Revised Answer:
I understand Cindy's perspective that remote work might not be as efficient as traditional office-based work. However, I believe that as technology continues to advance, remote work will eventually become the predominant mode of work. A prime example of this is my friend's company, which has pioneered a virtual office in the meta-world. Staff members are required to log in punctually, mirroring traditional office timings. Within this virtual space, they engage in routine office activities, from attending meetings to collaborating on projects. Equipped with microphones and cameras, they can communicate just as they would face-to-face. According to my friend, the experience closely mirrors working in a physical office, indicating that remote work might indeed be the future of professional engagements.