카테고리 없음

TOEFL Speaking Test feedback with GPT_230730

YULSIGN 2023. 7. 30. 21:14

Q1

 

ME:

I agree with the following statement that as people get older, their personalities change. Some people would now agree with my idea because they might think that the personality mostly come from innate and instinct factors. however, I believe that it's really important to consider external Factor. One thing that comes to my mind when I get this question is that my mother personality has also changed. For example her personality has changed after birth because she has to interact with her peers.

 

 

GPT:

Your response has a clear structure and is quite coherent. However, there are grammatical errors, awkward phrasings, and some lack of detail that might slightly affect your score.
Score: 3
Here's the feedback:
Language Use: There are a few grammatical and vocabulary errors that need to be corrected.
Development: You gave an example, but it is quite vague. It might be beneficial to provide more specific information about how your mother's personality changed.
Here's a suggested revision of your response:
"I agree with the statement that people's personalities change as they age. Some people may not agree with my perspective because they might think that personality traits are largely innate or instinctual. However, I believe it's essential to consider external factors. A prime example that comes to my mind when considering this question is the transformation in my mother's personality. Specifically, her personality underwent changes after giving birth as she interacted more with other parents. Her experiences, interactions, and the responsibilities of motherhood have significantly influenced her behavior and responses, evidencing that personalities do evolve over time."

 

Q2

 

ME:

According to the letter, the writer suggests that the broadcasting schedule of University's radio station should be extended and the woman in the conversation thinks that this is not a good idea for two reasons. First she asserts that the time of the radio doesn't have to be extended because if some student miss the information on broadcast they can check the detail of information on the website posted. Second, she also mentioned that the contents of broadcast don't have to be expanded because students do not rely so much on broadcasting for entertainment.

 

GPT:

Your response is reasonably well-structured, and you've presented the opposing viewpoint accurately. However, there are a few grammar errors and awkward phrasing that might slightly impact your score.
Score: 3
Here's the feedback:
Language Use: There are minor grammar and vocabulary errors that need to be corrected.
Development: You have concisely summarized the woman's viewpoints. However, adding more detail about her arguments might make your response more persuasive.
Here's a suggested revision of your response:
"According to the letter, the author suggests that the broadcasting schedule of the university's radio station should be extended. However, the woman in the conversation disagrees with this suggestion for two reasons. First, she asserts that there is no need to extend the radio's broadcast time. If students miss the broadcast, they can still access detailed information posted on the university's website. Secondly, she contends that expanding the content of the broadcast isn't necessary because students don't primarily rely on the radio station for entertainment."

 

Q3

 

ME:

According to the reading, warning coloaration is use of color by potential prayer animal to alert predators that they are not appropriate for food source and the professor describes two examples to explain this. First, he start the topic by talking about butterfly they use a wing with a high contrast color which has poisonous substance and the predator when they see that they are not willing to attack because they remember it and second example is blue ring octopus they use the blue as a warning color which has a bacteria and paralyze their predator. 

 

GPT:

Your response is understandable and effectively summarizes the content of the lecture. However, there are some grammar and vocabulary errors and awkward phrasing that might affect your clarity and overall score.
Score: 3
Here's the feedback:
Language Use: There are several grammar and vocabulary errors that need to be corrected.
Development: You have accurately summarized the professor's main points. Including a bit more detail about each example could enhance your response.
Here's a suggested revision of your response:
According to the reading, warning coloration is a strategy used by potential prey animals to alert predators that they are not suitable food sources. The professor provides two examples to illustrate this concept. First, he discusses butterflies, which utilize wings with high-contrast colors to indicate the presence of poisonous substances. Predators tend to avoid attacking these butterflies as they recognize and remember the warning colors. The second example he gives is the blue-ringed octopus, which uses blue as a warning color. This octopus contains a bacteria that can paralyze its predators, further reinforcing the threat indicated by its coloration.

 

Q4

 

ME:

According to the lecture, the professor describe how beneficial weeds are to soil how and she described two examples to explain this. First, she assures that weeds are useful to prevent erosion. For example when Heavy Rain occurs weeds are helpful to hold soil together and second she also highlights that weeds are helpful to fertilize soil because they have nutrient which is helpful.

 

GPT:

Your response summarizes the main points of the lecture and demonstrates an understanding of the topic. However, there are a few errors and awkward phrases that could be improved.
Score: 3
Feedback:
Language Use: There are a few grammatical errors and awkward phrases. These don't seriously affect understanding, but they do detract from the overall quality of the response.
Topic Development: You have successfully identified the main points of the lecture, but more details could enhance your response.
Here's a revised version of your response:
"According to the lecture, the professor explains the benefits of weeds to soil, providing two examples for clarification. Firstly, she asserts that weeds are effective in preventing soil erosion. For instance, during heavy rainfall, weeds can hold the soil together, preventing it from being washed away. Secondly, she underscores that weeds contribute to soil fertility, as they are rich in nutrients beneficial to the soil."